Earth Summit Blog

Three years ago, the Group of 20 countries pledged to phase out environmentally-harmful and ineffective subsidies. The leaders of these twenty influential countries have since made many other promises to deal with climate change and the range of global sustainability challenges, including at the recently concluded Clean Energy Ministerial. As countries meet this week to set the agenda for 2012, they should commit to showing leadership where it counts. This June, we need to turn pledges into real actionsstarting at the G20 summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, and continuing through to the Rio+20 Earth Summit (read here and here for ideas).

Dear Presidents and Prime Ministers, Kings and Queens:

Once every generation or so, you're asked to step outside your national mindset and collectively figure out how to safeguard the planet and all its inhabitants. I grant you this: it's no easy task.

Friday, 13 April 2012 10:11

Rio+20: Plan 'A' for Planet Earth

Written by Owen Gaffney

The media often describes geoengineering — large-scale deliberate interference in the climate system — as Plan B for the planet, a last resort should political negotiations to curb greenhouse gas emissions fail.

Almost by default this makes the UN’s Rio+20 summit in June Plan A for Planet Earth. So, is Plan A any good?

In order to reach the visionary ideal of a green economy, we'll need a Clean Revolution across the globe. At the Rio+20 Earth Summit in June this year, top-level politicians will be called upon to help catalyse the global transition to a green economy, alleviate poverty and create stable economic prosperity for all. Despite the huge advances made by the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) since its inception at the original Rio Earth Summit in 1992, it is clear that this transition needs to be quicker, ambitions greater, and actions stronger.

Friday, 06 April 2012 14:17

The Public Trust Doctrine and Rio+20

Written by Mary Turnipseed

Setting humanity on a sustainable course will require striking a balance between the use of natural resources and their conservation.  A widespread but often overlooked doctrine called the Public Trust Doctrine (PTD) provides a legal foundation and implementation framework for achieving sustainable resource use.  Two key topics at Rio+20 in particular could be clarified by applying the PTD: 1) protecting the rights of future generations to functioning ecosystems and 2) governing resources beyond national jurisdiction.  We recommend that the notion of the ‘Public Trust’ be incorporated into the conversations regarding institutional frameworks for sustainable development at Rio+20.

The Zero Draft of the Outcome Document represents a strong starting point for effective and successful negotiations. The UN Secretariat has synthesised an honest and fair record of the conversations to date. But there remains much to play for. Currently the Zero Draft lacks the urgency, ambition, and detail required to use Rio as an opportunity to re-imagine our socio-economic systems and the way in which they work in harmony with nature, to deliver greater well-being for all, now and into the future.

The world needs a regular, comprehensive State of the Planet Assessment. Can Rio+20 deliver?

The upcoming United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) will focus on two themes: Green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication, and the institutional framework for sustainable development. These two themes have received ample attention by a wide range of stakeholders over the past months already – and will increasingly do so as the conference draws closer and the preparatory process get more intense.

Twenty years after the Rio Conference and a decade after the World Summit on Sustainable Development, publicly-funded International Financial Institutions (IFIs), including the World Bank, continue to undermine sustainable development by merely paying lip service to gender equality and women’s empowerment. While IFIs claim that their mission is to eradicate poverty, Gender Action research shows that IFI projects routinely fail to acknowledge and redress gender inequality, promote women’s participation in project activities, and devote inadequate resources to gender-related development issues. Many IFI projects even reinforce existing patriarchal gender roles and exacerbate inequalities, which increases the vulnerability of poor women and girls.

Page 1 of 2